Explaining the goals and aspirations of the New World Order
Barack Obama sworn in again, but without a Bible
After John Roberts, the Chief Justice of the US allegedly "forgot" the right lines of the presidential oath on the inauguration day,Barack Obama decided to retake his oath but this time without a Bible and without media coverage only pictures of the event were made available by some "selected"Journalists.
How on earth could the chief justice forget the lines of the 35-word oath which he was supposed to have carefully memorized?How come the 2nd oath taking wasn't publicized like the 1st one was? The truth is Barack Obama had no intention of swearing on the Bible as he didn't want to seem to represent any religion or group since he intends to usher in a world that embraces every faith and belief and since it was customary to swear on a Bible, The masons planned that the 1st oath taking would be messed up and rendered invalid so his new oath taking without the Bible would be the valid one.There was little media coverage of the second oath taking because they knew it would draw widespread criticism from the Christians.To corroborate what i'm saying, read this statement from a popular masonic writer Manly Hall:"The true Mason is not creed-bound. He realizes with the divine illumination of his lodge that as a Mason his religion must be universal" (The Lost Keys of Freemasonry, Manly P. Hall, 33rd, page 65, Macoy Publishing and Masonic Supply Co. Richmond, Va., 1976.)
.Barack Obama simply wanted to show that he was not bound to any creed or dogma but that he represented all faiths and couldn't be narrowed down to just one faith.
Here are excerpts from a tabloid that reported on these events
He's sorted out the legalities, but could Barack Obama have made the first political mistake of his presidency?
After constitutional law experts questioned the validity of his swearing-in because of a fluffed line in the oath of office, Mr Obama moved quickly to quash speculation that his presidency was in any way illegitimate.
John Roberts, the Chief Justice charged who helped bungle the oath on Tuesday, was summoned to the White House and, in front of a small pool of reporters, Mr Obama carefully and accurately repeated the 35-word oath prescribed by Article 2 of the Constitution.
The problem was, no-one thought to bring a Bible and Mr Obama decided to go ahead without one.
Related Links
* Obama wins battle of the BlackBerry
* Fidel Casto - Obama is 'absolutely sincere'
* Doh! President Obama retakes his oath
Legally, that was fine – the Constitution makes no mention of the Bible. Politically, it may prove to be a problem.
"The Obama boobery with the oath, led to a second oath. But the Bible, like the once disdained flag lapel pin, was nowhere to be seen," sniped the Hillaryis44 blog, referring to a row during the presidential campaign over a missing lapel pin.
"Expect a third oath when bitter small town gun- and Bible-toting America finds out."
Mr Obama's likely reaction in the event of a backlash will be that he did not consider last night's oath to be the one that counts. The White House counsel, Greg Craig, said last night that the Administration believed that Mr Obama was "sworn in appropriately" on Tuesday.
"Yet the oath appears in the Constitution itself and out of the abundance of caution, because there was one word out of sequence, Chief Justice John Roberts will administer the oath a second time," he added.
On Tuesday, Mr Obama was sworn in with his left hand on the Bible used by his great political hero, Abraham Lincoln, on his first inauguration in 1861. That book was returned to the Library of Congress straight afterwards.
It is not clear whether Mr Roberts, the Supreme Court Chief Justice, had been expected to bring a Bible with him but it might come as a shock to some of Mr Obama's more devout supporters – he and his family are regular churchgoers – that no Bible was available last night and the ceremony went ahead without one.
The second oath was taken in the White House Map Room, witnessed not by a crowd of two million but four members of the White House press corps. “We decided that because it was so much fun ...,” Mr Obama joked as the reporters filed in.
No TV camera crews or news photographers – although pictures were taken by a White House photographer – and even Michelle Obama, the President's wife, was absent.
Mr Roberts put on his black robe.
“Are you ready to take the oath?” he said.
"Yes, I am,” Mr Obama said. “And we’re going to do it very slowly.”
Mr Roberts then led Mr Obama through the oath without any missteps.
"The retaking of the oath went without a hitch and Obama was successfully sworn in, a second time, as president of the United States Of America. But this time he done it without his left hand on the bible," reported the Atheist News weblog.
"Obviously this is not that much of a big deal and the second taking of the oath was just, as the White House lawyer put it, "out of the abundance of caution". But it is refreshing to see that Obama doesn't attach much important to religious pomp and ceremony."
Culled From Timesonline
How on earth could the chief justice forget the lines of the 35-word oath which he was supposed to have carefully memorized?How come the 2nd oath taking wasn't publicized like the 1st one was? The truth is Barack Obama had no intention of swearing on the Bible as he didn't want to seem to represent any religion or group since he intends to usher in a world that embraces every faith and belief and since it was customary to swear on a Bible, The masons planned that the 1st oath taking would be messed up and rendered invalid so his new oath taking without the Bible would be the valid one.There was little media coverage of the second oath taking because they knew it would draw widespread criticism from the Christians.To corroborate what i'm saying, read this statement from a popular masonic writer Manly Hall:"The true Mason is not creed-bound. He realizes with the divine illumination of his lodge that as a Mason his religion must be universal" (The Lost Keys of Freemasonry, Manly P. Hall, 33rd, page 65, Macoy Publishing and Masonic Supply Co. Richmond, Va., 1976.)
.Barack Obama simply wanted to show that he was not bound to any creed or dogma but that he represented all faiths and couldn't be narrowed down to just one faith.
Here are excerpts from a tabloid that reported on these events
He's sorted out the legalities, but could Barack Obama have made the first political mistake of his presidency?
After constitutional law experts questioned the validity of his swearing-in because of a fluffed line in the oath of office, Mr Obama moved quickly to quash speculation that his presidency was in any way illegitimate.
John Roberts, the Chief Justice charged who helped bungle the oath on Tuesday, was summoned to the White House and, in front of a small pool of reporters, Mr Obama carefully and accurately repeated the 35-word oath prescribed by Article 2 of the Constitution.
The problem was, no-one thought to bring a Bible and Mr Obama decided to go ahead without one.
Related Links
* Obama wins battle of the BlackBerry
* Fidel Casto - Obama is 'absolutely sincere'
* Doh! President Obama retakes his oath
Legally, that was fine – the Constitution makes no mention of the Bible. Politically, it may prove to be a problem.
"The Obama boobery with the oath, led to a second oath. But the Bible, like the once disdained flag lapel pin, was nowhere to be seen," sniped the Hillaryis44 blog, referring to a row during the presidential campaign over a missing lapel pin.
"Expect a third oath when bitter small town gun- and Bible-toting America finds out."
Mr Obama's likely reaction in the event of a backlash will be that he did not consider last night's oath to be the one that counts. The White House counsel, Greg Craig, said last night that the Administration believed that Mr Obama was "sworn in appropriately" on Tuesday.
"Yet the oath appears in the Constitution itself and out of the abundance of caution, because there was one word out of sequence, Chief Justice John Roberts will administer the oath a second time," he added.
On Tuesday, Mr Obama was sworn in with his left hand on the Bible used by his great political hero, Abraham Lincoln, on his first inauguration in 1861. That book was returned to the Library of Congress straight afterwards.
It is not clear whether Mr Roberts, the Supreme Court Chief Justice, had been expected to bring a Bible with him but it might come as a shock to some of Mr Obama's more devout supporters – he and his family are regular churchgoers – that no Bible was available last night and the ceremony went ahead without one.
The second oath was taken in the White House Map Room, witnessed not by a crowd of two million but four members of the White House press corps. “We decided that because it was so much fun ...,” Mr Obama joked as the reporters filed in.
No TV camera crews or news photographers – although pictures were taken by a White House photographer – and even Michelle Obama, the President's wife, was absent.
Mr Roberts put on his black robe.
“Are you ready to take the oath?” he said.
"Yes, I am,” Mr Obama said. “And we’re going to do it very slowly.”
Mr Roberts then led Mr Obama through the oath without any missteps.
"The retaking of the oath went without a hitch and Obama was successfully sworn in, a second time, as president of the United States Of America. But this time he done it without his left hand on the bible," reported the Atheist News weblog.
"Obviously this is not that much of a big deal and the second taking of the oath was just, as the White House lawyer put it, "out of the abundance of caution". But it is refreshing to see that Obama doesn't attach much important to religious pomp and ceremony."
Culled From Timesonline
About
Music
Praise Looks Good on You
Badge
![](http://t2.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:bkR6Uu6lVS6unM:%3Ca%20href="http://www.fitnesscenterok.com/imagens/links.gif"%3Ehttp://www.fitnesscenterok.com/imagens/links.gif%3C/a%3E)
Wake Up World,The Devil has You
Repent Or Perish
© 2009 Created by Authur Jason on Ning. Create a Ning Network!
